Free AI writer that plans and writes in your voice.
Say what the post is about and who it is for. Optionally, bring your notes, an article or a document. Choose from three angles, and get a draft that keeps your rhythm and avoids tells that give AI writing away.
Three angles, then the post
The planner proposes three ways in and asks what only you can add. Pick one and the draft streams in, written for your reader in your voice, with a check for the tells.
How the AI writer works
It follows the process of a writing agent built for one author: plan before writing, write from the author's own material, check the draft for everything that gives machine writing away.
Brief it like an editor
What the post is about, who the one reader is, what kind of post, how long. Bring material if you have it: notes, a web page, a document. Say how well you know the subject and what you have actually done with it.
Pick an angle, add what only you can
The planner proposes three genuinely different ways in, each with its opening and its spine, and marks what every post on the topic already says. It also asks two or three questions only you can answer. Pick an angle, answer in a line, or skip.
Read the draft with the voice check open
The post streams in, written for your reader from your material and your answers, in your voice. A checklist flags the tells, the flat rhythm, the long sentences. Edit in place, ask for a change, pick a title, download.
What the writer is told to do
What the check catches
In today's fast-paced world, invoice processing is a critical function that organizations must navigate. In this post, we will explore the key considerations.
It's not just about speed, it's about accuracy. Leveraging automation is a game-changer that unlocks the power of your team.
What the guidelines ask for
We had eleven boxes on the whiteboard and four of them were crossed out before anyone had opened a vendor website.
That is the whole story. It took us six weeks to believe it.
- One reader
- The post is written for a single person with a known level of expertise. Nothing is explained down to a general audience.
- No setup
- Two or three sentences of context at most, then the point. No “what is X”, no “in this post we will”.
- Written like speech
- Plain words, complete sentences, the rhythm of someone explaining a thing they know. Long sentence, short verdict.
- Precise
- “Fails when you mutate shared data across threads”, not “doesn't always work”. Numbers come from your material or they are not there.
- From experience
- What you built, what broke, what you'd skip. The planner asks for it; the writer puts it in as yours.
- Honest about limits
- If you are still learning the subject, the post says so. Readers trust the gap more than the bluff.
- No AI tells
- No em dashes, no “delve”, no “game-changer”, no “not just X but Y”. Checked after writing, on every edit.
Who uses an AI writer like this
People with something to say who would rather not start from a generic draft.
Engineers and founders who blog
You have the experience and the notes. The planner turns them into an angle; the writer keeps your voice; you add the detail only you have.
Newsletter writers
A weekly issue from a page of notes, in the voice your subscribers signed up for, with the tells caught before you hit send.
Developer relations and content teams
Drafts that follow a house style by default, with the author's samples on top, so the post sounds like the person whose name is on it.
Consultants and operators
Turn a project you ran into a post people can use: what you did, what broke, what you'd skip.
Anyone who edits AI drafts for a living
Start from a draft that already skips the setup and the clichés, and spend the time on the part that matters.
A draft from your material is still a draft
The writer does not research and does not invent. If a number is not in your notes or your answers, it is not in the post. The voice check removes the tells, and your samples give it your rhythm. What it cannot supply is what happened to you. The questions are there to get that out of you; the rest is yours to read, out loud, before you publish.
Before you publish
- Read the first paragraph as your reader. If it sets up instead of starting, cut it.
- Find the vaguest sentence and replace it with a specific one from your own experience.
- Check every number against your source, then check the terminology.
- Run the voice check after your edits; your own edits can bring the tells back.
Questions about the AI writer
What does “in your voice” mean here?
Two things. Your style notes (a line or two about how you write) and up to three pieces you have published. The writer reads the pieces for rhythm, paragraphing, how you open and close, and the words you use, and the voice check measures them: average sentence length and how much it varies, paragraph length, em dashes, bold. The draft is written toward those numbers and checked against them. It never reuses a sentence of yours.
What house style does it follow?
A set of writing guidelines for technical and professional posts that every draft obeys before anything you add: picture one specific reader; skip the setup and get to the point; write like you speak, with plain words; be precise; don't explain what the reader can infer; write from experience and admit what you don't know; no AI-style phrasing. Your own notes and samples sit on top of that, so the result is your voice with good habits.
Why does it ask for angles before writing?
Because the angle is most of the post. A planning call reads your topic, reader and material and proposes three genuinely different ways in, each with its opening, its spine and the way it could go wrong, plus what every post on the subject already says and what is fresh. You pick, or take the recommended one. It costs about a second and a cent, and it is where a good editor would start.
What are the “only you can add” questions?
The planner names two or three things from your own experience that would make the post yours: a number, a failure, a moment, a decision. Answer in a line, or skip them. Answers are treated as first-hand material and written as yours, which is what readers trust and what no amount of generic prose can fake.
Does it research the topic?
No. It writes from what you give it: your notes, a web page or a document, and your answers. That keeps the tool free and keeps invented facts out: the writer is told never to supply a number or a quote that isn't in your material. If you want research in the post, bring it as material.
What does the voice check look for?
The tells that mark writing as machine-made: em dashes, “delve”, “game-changer”, “in today's fast-paced world”, “it's not just X, it's Y” and a longer list; sentence lengths that barely vary; runs of short punchy sentences; too many bold words; sentences over thirty words; openings that announce the post; closings that summarise it. Failures are the banned phrases; warnings are drift. With samples, drift is judged against your own numbers.
How long can a post be?
Short is about 500 words, Standard about 1,000, Long about 1,800. Longer than that, and the better tool is a second post. Writing costs real compute, so there is a daily allowance of drafts per visitor, with separate allowances for plans and revisions.
Can I edit it, and how do I get it out?
Yes. Edit the Markdown in place with a live preview; the voice check follows your edits. Ask for a change in a sentence (“cut the intro”, “add my example”, “stronger close”) and the post is revised, keeping what you didn't mention. Then copy the Markdown, download it as .md, or download a Word document.
What happens to my material and my samples?
They are sent to the writing model for that run and not stored on our side. Your style notes, samples and expertise are saved in your own browser so you don't have to paste them next time; a “Forget” link clears them. Nothing is used to train models.
Is this the same as an AI detector saying a post is human?
No. The voice check removes the tells and gives your rhythm back, but what makes a post read as yours is the detail only you have. The questions and your material are where that comes from; the guidelines even say so. Add the specific thing, then read it out loud.